Practices concerned over ICD-10 switchover, survey says
September 5, 2012 in Medical Technology
ATLANTA – Medical practices nationwide have expressed their concern regarding the impact of an ICD-10 switchover, according to a recent survey finding 96 percent of respondents concerned about the transition to the updated coding system.
The Nuesoft Technologies sanctioned survey, “Attitudes Toward the Transition to ICD-10 and ANSI-5010,” also showed that 73 percent of respondents anticipate ICD-10 significantly affecting their practice, whether it be financially or operationally.
[See also: HHS announces one-year delay for ICD-10 .]
With HHS issuing a final rule that establishes Oct. 1, 2014 as the ICD-10 compliance deadline, physicians and medical personnel are girding themselves for what many officials perceive to be a complex labyrinth of documentation.
This diagnosis code is slated to replace ICD-9 and expand the number of diagnosis and procedural codes from 17,000 to some 155,000.
“It’s not the number,” said Barry Blumenfeld, MD, CIO of Maine Medical Center in Portland, Maine. The complex addition of coding, he added, “makes things very complicated for physicians choosing codes and will require a lot of training and a lot of insight into how these codes are different.”
Some officials say the transition to ICD-10 will be one of the most significant changes the physician practice community has ever undertaken. The more detailed level of specificity required by ICD-10 will impact areas of practice management processes, including documentation, billing, workflow and quality reporting.
In addition, many practice software systems will need to be upgraded, and physicians and responsible staff will need extensive training to successfully make the transition.
[See also: Groups express support, concern over ICD-10 delay.]
“Most physicians are dreading the change to ICD-10 because the number of codes and level of specificity will increase exponentially,” said Barbara Dunn, president of MedRecovery Solutions, Inc., a large billing firm that works with practices throughout the country to optimize operations through appropriate coding and billing.
Julie Nobles, president of Premiere Medical Billing, echoed Dunn’s concern. “Most physicians I have spoken with are worried about the rollout of ICD-10 because they are not certain the increased costs and staff hours justify the change to a new and larger set of diagnostic codes.”
Yet, for some physicians, the impending transition is being taken in stride. According to Robert Goldman, MD, the founding physician of Georgia Hormones, with the proper training, the transition to ICD-10 will be doable.
“We wanted to stay ahead of the curve so the transition to ICD-10 would be as streamlined as possible,” said Goldman. “Our practice coding specialist, as well as all of our physicians, finished a course this year all about ICD-10 and the new diagnosis codes. Even though the list of codes will be the size of 10 Manhattan phone books, we are prepared. In fact, Europe has been using ICD-10 codes successfully since 2002.”
[See also: Finalized ICD-10 delay keeps process moving forward by keeping CFOs engaged.]
The Centers for Medicaid and Medicare Services (CMS) has stressed that ICD-10 will provide more specific data than the 30-year-old ICD-9 and better reflect current medical practices. CMS indicated that the added detail embedded within ICD-10 codes will inform health care providers and health plans of patient incidence and history, which improves the effectiveness of case management and care coordination functions.